Eight benefits companies gain by reducing carbon footprints
December 14, 2009 by Tom GuayPosted in: Cost Cutting, Latest News & Views, News
Whether or not climate change is a problem, there are plenty of non-global-warming reasons why companies are turning green anyway.
It’s all about money saved and liability risks avoided, not protecting the planet, according to an article just posted online by Harvard Business Publishing.
Andrew Winston, co-author of Green to Gold and author of Green Recovery, says the blunt economic reality is that by reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, whether you like the idea or not, you’ll:
- save money now because any company that cuts its GHG emissions has to increase its energy efficiency, and that makes companies more profitable
- save money later because, by adopting a renewable energy model, a company can count on zero variable costs for wind and sunshine
- reduce risk by avoiding all the liabilities associated with competing for commodities in short supply, such as water and oil
- answer pressing customer demands for a green supply chain, as exemplified by Wal-Mart’s demand that its suppliers answer questions about their sustainability
- attract and retain the best people, especially the next generation that assumes financial success and corporate social responsibility go hand-in-hand
- drive innovation
- keep the U.S. safer from global conflicts, and
- make the U.S. more competitive in a world that demands clean energy.
None of these benefits listed has much to do with the hot debates about whether or how climate change occurs. Winston suggests that global warming alarmists and skeptics alike overlook the practical reasons for taking action.
Tags: carbon footprint, energy efficiency, Green Recovery, Green to Gold
GreenandMore.com
December 14th, 2009 at 7:00 am
[...] Go here to read the rest: Eight benefits companies gain by reducing carbon footprints … [...]
December 17th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
If Climategate has taught us anything, it is about fraud and deceit for the almighty dollar. Having said that, the definition of “carbon footprint” is nullified and should be removed from our vocabulary becasue it too, is non existent.
December 19th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
Are you a scientist, climatologist, degreed engineer? Unless yes, talk less, listen and study more, and take a trip to China, where the effects of harming the planet are all too evident.