GreenerWorking.com » Google lights fire under promise of clean energy

Google lights fire under promise of clean energy

June 11, 2009 by Tom Guay
Posted in: Cost Cutting, Green Investing, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, News, Technology, Waste & Pollution

Google’s out to prove that king coal won’t permanently have a financial advantage over renewable energy.

High costs of renewable energies (such as solar, wind and thermal) compared to electricity created by burning coal, has been a huge hurdle for the clean energy sector to overcome. Traditional wisdom has it that renewable energy can only be a niche player in the power markets.

But Google set out in 2007 to disprove this wisdom, and this week, the search engine company said it expects to buy all of its electricity from renewable energy suppliers at prices cheaper than electricity provided by coal-fired power plants.

Google’s so-called green energy czar, Bill Weihl told Reuters news service it’s “even odds, more or less” that Google will run totally on clean energy that’s cheaper than coal within three years.

If Google pulls this off, it could open the door for all sorts of companies and industries to switch to clean energy, based on renewable sources, which would make it much easier for the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The bold goal of replacing coal-fired electricity is part of Google’s green goals to reduce its carbon footprint, adopt efficient computing and help employees go green. Click here for Google’s green plans.

The company’s story is here.

Google has also developed a smart power meter that gives consumers the ability to monitor their daily electric power usage on their home computers. Google has partnered with eight power companies to test the Google Powermeter so homeowners can control usage and cut costs.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , ,

One Response to “Google lights fire under promise of clean energy”

  1. Rick Says:

    Someone needs to makes sure Google doesn’t cheat. All fossil fuels should be included eliminated from the mix, not just coal. That means no natural gas, no petroleum or petroleum derived gas, no oil shale, and no tar sands. Also, they shouldn’t take food off the table of starving people in the world with food derived bio-fuels.

    I hope they can succeed in being truely green.


advertisement

Marketplace

  • gam-logo-long1GreenandMore.com offers green, energy-saving products for a healthy home and office. Contact us about co-branding opportunities and employee discounts for your company.

    More…

  • View more offers

    Quick Vote

    • What do you think will be the biggest green story in 2010 ?

      • The Senate kills cap-and-trade legislation (37%, 146 Votes)
      • Solar and wind energy emerge as affordable ways to cut power bills (30%, 119 Votes)
      • Demand grows sharply for green products and services (17%, 69 Votes)
      • Scientists conclusively settle the global warming debate, one way or another (11%, 43 Votes)
      • Congress approves cap-and-trade legislation (5%, 21 Votes)

      Total Voters: 398

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • Blair Thomas: I'm just reacting to what you wrote. Your knowledge may be great. But what you wrote did merit my criticism. I don't w...
    • Blair Thomas: Your religious ferver is admirable, but man, I feel bad for your adherents. So many rules in order to feel righteous....
    • Tom Guay: Blair, don't kill the messenger. Why don't you read all the news links I provided in the story before spouting off li...
    • Blair Thomas: This website is a disgrace. If you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't say "surprisingly, Lindsey Graham..."...
    • Steve Gilbertson: Obama's moving to the middle because cap and trade is just alot of B.S. and he knows it - they (dems) thought they could...
    • Ryk: My wife expects a real valentine and real chocolates. Enjoy the snow....


    a