Is it too easy to claim to be green? Congress wants to know
June 9, 2009 by Tom GuayPosted in: In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, News
It may get much harder to jump on the green bandwagon unless companies can prove how they measure the “greeniness” of their products and services.
Reason: Congress is gearing up to define what green means. A House Energy and Commerce panel meets today to put a stop to greenwashing — making false or unprovable claims about green attributes of products and services.
Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL), chairman of the Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection Subcommittee, is looking for legislative ways to define green marketing practices. Rush worries that consumers are being misled by a flurry of confusing green marketing claims.
He wants the Federal Trade Commission to impose standards that define what it takes to make an eco-friendly claim about a product, service or operation. Rush is responding to a greenwashing report that found that the number of products claiming to be green is increasing by 79% a year.
For hearing information and testimony, click here.
To eliminate greenwashing claims, the panel will focus on a study by the eco-marketing consultant firm, TerraChoice. The company’s report, the Seven Sins of Greenwashing, concludes that many green product claims misrepresent their supposedly environmentally friendly attributes. The report found that 98% of products reviewed committed at least one of the seven sins.
For example, TerraChoice says it’s misleading to claim that paper is green just because it was made from trees grown in a sustainable manner. The Seven Sins report notes that other more important factors are in play, including the type of energy used in the process, greenhouse gas emissions related to the making of the paper and the air and water pollution from pulp and paper mills.
Watch for legislation mandating third-party verification of green claims. Underwriters Laboratories has such a program.
Tags: eco-friendly, FTC, green products, greenhouse gas emissions, greenwashing, Rep. Bobby Rush, TerraChoice, Underwriters Laboaratories
GreenandMore.com
June 11th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
What happened to LEED and the US Green Building council? Or do I have too narrow of a focus?
June 11th, 2009 at 2:32 pm
There will have to be a green rating system. I.E. 1-10 greening scale for instance. This will take out the confusion and cheating on truly green and not green at all.
Thanks,
Terry Sherwood
June 11th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
[...] Read the full post at GreenerWorking. It may get much harder to jump on the green bandwagon unless companies can prove how they measure the “greeniness” of their products and services. [...]
June 12th, 2009 at 8:33 am
I have to say that I’m skeptical of this effort. Congress is going to decide what green means? That strikes me as impossible and hopelessly flawed from the get go.
Remember what happened with “organic”? Now that you have to be certified to use this term, small farms that were practicing organic methods long before it was fashionable are no longer allowed by law to call their practices what they are unless they get certified.
Of course greenwashing is a big and growing problem (part of my job as a green home and lifestyle consultant is to help people ferret it out). I’m not sure legislation could solve this problem though and it may create new ones. We are faced with deceptive marketing practices in so many industries. I tend to believe that marketing is by its nature a dirty business, but that people recognize a company with integrity when they see it.