Key to profits and a green rep: Environmental reporting
September 23, 2009 by Tom GuayPosted in: Cost Cutting, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, News
Q: What’s the fastest way to give your company a black eye in today’s green-sensitive world?
A: Don’t report any environmental information, and especially don’t report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions like carbon dioxide (CO2).
That’s how hundreds of companies ended up at the bottom of a new Green Rankings survey published by Newsweek magazine.
The key to getting top honors:
- Create environmental metrics, like measuring pollution created, waste generated and GHG emissions released
- Adopt programs to reverse these events, and
- Report your progress.
That’s the approach adopted by hundreds of companies that scored well in the Green Rankings analysis. The top five companies are:
- Hewlett-Packard for its strong programs to reduce GHG emissions
- Dell for its commitment to rely on renewable energy
- Johnson & Johnson for its commitment to climate change programs
- Intel Corporation for its reliance on renewable energy purchases, and
- IBM for its longstanding commitment to train employees on environmental awareness.
Newsweek spent a year studying the greeniness of the nation’s 500 largest companies and found that companies that set environmental goals — such as reducing their carbon footprint — and publicized the company’s progress in reaching these goals also scored better financially and ranked better than their peers.
The Newsweek story is here.
The magazine created its Green Rankings without the support or feedback of the companies. To do this, Newsweek used a program created by Trucost and NSF International to rate corporate green performances. The methodology is described here.
Many utilities are prominently at the bottom of the list, due to their release of GHGs when they burn coal to create electricity.
One utility, Duke Energy scored 490th in the Newsweek ranking. But this was calculated before Duke switched sides in the global warming debate. It now supports a cap-and-trade law to reduce GHG emissions. The energy company’s statement is here. It will be curious to see how Duke scores in next year’s rankings.
The bottom five are:
- Consol Energy, basic materials
- ConAgra Foods, food and beverage
- Allegheny Energy, utility
- NRG Energy, utility, and
- Peabody Energy.
All of the listings are here.
Tags: cap-and-trade, GHG reporting, green companies, sustainability
GreenandMore.com
October 1st, 2009 at 2:48 pm
The green hysteria is just that and nothing more. Yes, pollution is bad and the perpetrators should be punished, but global warming is political tripe and nothing more. Those making global warming assertions often have the most to gain in terms of money and/or power. Time to push back against these anti-life advocates and send them packing.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Shame on you Tom, for being a constant promoter of this “join us or we will punish you” green movement, that is based on the claims of scientists who refuse to debate any dissenting scientists. If the stakes werent’ so big, I’d say to go ahead and believe this nonsense, and someone else can believe in unicorns, and no big deal.
But you’re promoting an ideology that will kill our lifestyles, our economy, and makes lots of good people feel guilty over nothing. Shame on you Tom Guay.