<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manufacturers create their own green ratings for electronic products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenerworking.com/manufacturers-create-their-own-green-ratings-for-electronic-products/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenerworking.com/manufacturers-create-their-own-green-ratings-for-electronic-products</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Matkins</title>
		<link>http://greenerworking.com/manufacturers-create-their-own-green-ratings-for-electronic-products/comment-page-1#comment-4065</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Matkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenerworking.com/?p=8103#comment-4065</guid>
		<description>I saw this report on CFL health concerns (http://www.cleanpowercanada.bravehost.com/report1.html) that has me wondering if we&#039;re taking shortcuts in our frenzy to be green.  Are there any formal studies being done to determine if there are UV and &quot;dirty electricity&quot; issues with CFLs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this report on CFL health concerns (<a href="http://www.cleanpowercanada.bravehost.com/report1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cleanpowercanada.bravehost.com/report1.html</a>) that has me wondering if we&#8217;re taking shortcuts in our frenzy to be green.  Are there any formal studies being done to determine if there are UV and &#8220;dirty electricity&#8221; issues with CFLs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

