Those that post arguing that somone is “biased” for taking a position can never see that they are biased themselves and rarely put forth a coherent set of arguments rooted in evidence. They also can never seem to understand that truth or reality can be known amidst the lies and deception.

Therefore a few facts are in order. The IPCC’s own data show that less than 3% of the CO2 in the atmosphere derives from manmade sources. Further, CO2 is only 4% of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere (90% of it is water vapor). Yet, the global warming alarmists argue to try to deceive the public is that the ppm level of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased steadily from 280 to the current 380, a 36% increase since the early 1800′s when industrialization began leaving the public to conclude that industrialization is the evil culprit. What they NEVER explain is how it can be that CO2 has increased 36% presumably due to human activity while all scientific measurements conclude that less than 3% of current CO2 levels comes from manmade sources. Someone is wrong here.

The mountain of evidence for the large increase in CO2 since the early 1800′s is the natural cycle of minute ocean temperature changes. A slight increase in ocean temperature (potentially caused by sun activity) releases dissolved CO2 into the atmosphere accounting for the change from 280 to 380 ppm. In other words, it is temperature that drives CO2 levels not the other way around! As the IPCC’s own data show, very little if any of the increase is due to the manmade sources.

One is then left to wonder what could possibly motivate people to perpetuate the fraud of AGW? That is where bias and speculation do play a part. Is it money, research grants, disdain of fossil fuel sources, earth worship, who knows? Meanwhile, they can cast aspersions at people and institutions they despise with claims that people like me are “biased” simply because we make an argument rooted in knowledge. They will rely on junk science while promoting the idiocy of “go green” in the face of all the evidence to the contrary simply to make themselves feel good about protecting the planet.

The best example of why is given below:
“An economics professor at Texas Tech said he had never failed a single student before but had, once, failed an entire class. The class had insisted that socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer. The professor then said ok, we will have an experiment in this class on socialism.

All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A. After the first test the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy. But, as the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too; so they studied little. The second Test average was a D! No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around the average was an F.

The scores never increased as bickering, blame, name calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for anyone else. All failed to their great surprise and the professor told them that socialism would ultimately fail because the harder to succeed the greater the reward but when a government takes all the reward away; no one will try or succeed.”

The poorer the population the worse the pollution. I’ve traveled widely in the Philippines and know that to be true. The best way to control Global Warming (If you believe in it, I don’t) is to raise the standard of living for everybody, not lower the standard of living for the producers. I’m all for helping those out at the bottom of the food chain by giving them a hand, (Habitat for Humanity is a great example.), but just giving some one something without any commitment for self improvement is doomed to failure after failure.

Want to cut CO2and Pollution? Make sure the Utilities and industry are profitable so that they can afford to do so. Taxing them and giving some lucky few the money just passes the misery down the chain as All atilities and companies pass the cost on. That just makes sure home owners can’t afford to improve their homes, buy energy efficient appliances, or energy efficient transportation or even care to do so. Jobs leave the country and move to poorer countries that don’t care about the environment.

Net result: More CO2 output. More Pollution. Not Less.