GreenerWorking.com » Brown’s victory won’t shield you from GHG regulation

Brown’s victory won’t shield you from GHG regulation

January 21, 2010 by Tom Guay
Posted in: Latest News & Views, News

Watch out: The political shocker in Massachusetts won’t relieve business from worrying about climate change regulations.

Once newly elected Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) takes his Senate seat in Washington, D.C., EPA will be calling the shots on turning back the global warming phenomenon, not Congress.

Yes, Brown opposes healthcare legislation, and he’s also opposed to the cap-and-trade bills. The future for both controversial policies that are at the core of President Obama’s legislative agenda is shaky at best. Certainly they won’t survive in their current forms.

Even if the Democrats were able to somehow agree on a cap-and-trade bill and get it to the Senate floor for a vote, Brown represents the key vote needed to kill the bill. The Democrats now have only 59 of the 60 votes they’d need to break a GOP filibuster.

But this doesn’t mean there won’t be GHG regulations. Now, Obama will rely on EPA to do the dirty work of regulating, industry-by-industry, using the Clean Air Act.

What can be particularly troubling about the lack of Senate action on the cap-and-trade bill is that, at least in the Senate, industry lobbyists can greatly influence the final details of the bill. Senators and Representatives are pretty easy to sway when it comes to special interests.

EPA on the other hand has a much stiffer backbone than Congress when it comes to regulating industries.

Other countries certainly lamented Scott’s victory as a signal the U.S. won’t be adopting the tough climate change legislation the international community prefers. But they’re overlooking what EPA can and will do.

However, even when the Democrats held total sway in the Senate before Brown’s election, it seemed doubtful the Senate would act.

Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is the lone Republican trying to broker a cap-and-trade deal, and so far, he hasn’t won any GOP converts to the cause. He’s even been censured by the South Carolina legislature for his attempt to find a middle ground that would open the way for a resurgence of nuclear power plants in the U.S.

Nuclear power plants are clean in that they don’t release GHGs.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “Brown’s victory won’t shield you from GHG regulation”

  1. Randy Hoover Says:

    Who Funds the EPA?

  2. Tom Guay Says:

    Congress funds EPA as it does all federal agencies.

Leave a Reply


advertisement

Marketplace

  • gam-logo-long1GreenandMore.com offers green, energy-saving products for a healthy home and office. Contact us about co-branding opportunities and employee discounts for your company.

    More…

  • View more offers

    Quick Vote

    • What do you think will be the biggest green story in 2010 ?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • Blair Thomas: I'm just reacting to what you wrote. Your knowledge may be great. But what you wrote did merit my criticism. I don't w...
    • Blair Thomas: Your religious ferver is admirable, but man, I feel bad for your adherents. So many rules in order to feel righteous....
    • Tom Guay: Blair, don't kill the messenger. Why don't you read all the news links I provided in the story before spouting off li...
    • Blair Thomas: This website is a disgrace. If you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't say "surprisingly, Lindsey Graham..."...
    • Steve Gilbertson: Obama's moving to the middle because cap and trade is just alot of B.S. and he knows it - they (dems) thought they could...
    • Ryk: My wife expects a real valentine and real chocolates. Enjoy the snow....


    a