GreenerWorking.com » Who takes the first hit in the era of GHG regulation?

Who takes the first hit in the era of GHG regulation?

October 1, 2009 by Tom Guay
Posted in: Latest News & Views, News

What’s it going to cost, and which companies are going to pay, now that EPA’s regulating greenhouse gases (GHGs)?

EPA says about 10,000 companies are covered by a new GHG reporting rule. This rule targets companies that release more than 25,000 metric tons a year of any mix of:

  • carbon dioxide
  • methane
  • nitrous oxide
  • hydrofluorocarbons
  • perflyorocarbons, and
  • fluorinated gases — sulfur hexafuloride, nitrogen trifluoride and hydrofluorinated ethers.

The actual cost is debatable. They’ll spend about $115 million in the first year. In subsequent years, EPA says it will cost $72 million a year in Clean Air Act compliance costs.

Industry reaction is mixed. Some say EPA understates the cost. However, one industrial operator tells GreenerWorking.com that the per-facility costs is minor. He’s treating this rule as “just an accounting exercise.” Other GHG rules will be much more worrisome, he says.

Who to believe? History shows that EPA’s estimates are closer to the mark. But until the rule’s been in place for a couple of years, the debate over costs will continue.

But what is clear is which companies will be hit by EPA’s GHG regulations.

The facilities that will have to report these releases are mostly fossil fuel suppliers and industrial gas suppliers, manufactures of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, power plants, and facilities that burn fossil fuels. And yes, livestock operations have to report if they release more than the 25,000 metric ton GHG threshold. Since most animal farms don’t, EPA downplays this impact.

To see if your company is regulated, EPA has an on-line tool to assess an operation based on its on-site fuel combustion.

There are several industrial categories that are NOT covered by this reporting rule:

  • electronics manufacturers
  • ethanol producers
  • fluorinated gas producers
  • food processors
  • magnesium producers
  • oil and natural gas systems
  • sulfur hexafluoride released from electrical equipment
  • underground coal mines
  • industrial landfills
  • wastewater treatment, and
  • coal suppliers.

Companies covered by the GHG reporting rule must start tracking and keeping records of their GHG emissions January 1, 2010. First reports to EPA are due in 2011, and EPA will make these reports public.

But this is just the start. An even more extensive GHG regulation will be released by EPA soon. This one will regulate actual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from power plants and large industrial facilities. Facilities that release more than 25,000 metric tons of CO2 a year will have to control these releases through an EPA permitting process that regulates new and modified facilities.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “Who takes the first hit in the era of GHG regulation?”

  1. Tracey Says:

    I recently went to Europe, they had these buttons on all the facilities. They are further ahead of us in that retrospect.

  2. moxiecat Says:

    Last time this article appeared there were a number of good comments. When articles are reposted why don’t you send along the comments? They are often as interesting as the article itself.
    GHG regulation is a hoax foisted on the public by politicians who (along with their friends) will become very, very rich once the cap-and-trade bill is shoved through Congress. Interestingly, facts don’t support global warming which has inspired its proponents to shout louder in order to distract you from the science behind it.
    What a stupid program that ultimately wastes taxpayer money and undermines businesses.


advertisement

Marketplace

  • gam-logo-long1GreenandMore.com offers green, energy-saving products for a healthy home and office. Contact us about co-branding opportunities and employee discounts for your company.

    More…

  • View more offers

    Quick Vote

    • What do you think will be the biggest green story in 2010 ?

      • The Senate kills cap-and-trade legislation (37%, 146 Votes)
      • Solar and wind energy emerge as affordable ways to cut power bills (30%, 119 Votes)
      • Demand grows sharply for green products and services (17%, 69 Votes)
      • Scientists conclusively settle the global warming debate, one way or another (11%, 43 Votes)
      • Congress approves cap-and-trade legislation (5%, 21 Votes)

      Total Voters: 398

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • Blair Thomas: I'm just reacting to what you wrote. Your knowledge may be great. But what you wrote did merit my criticism. I don't w...
    • Blair Thomas: Your religious ferver is admirable, but man, I feel bad for your adherents. So many rules in order to feel righteous....
    • Tom Guay: Blair, don't kill the messenger. Why don't you read all the news links I provided in the story before spouting off li...
    • Blair Thomas: This website is a disgrace. If you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't say "surprisingly, Lindsey Graham..."...
    • Steve Gilbertson: Obama's moving to the middle because cap and trade is just alot of B.S. and he knows it - they (dems) thought they could...
    • Ryk: My wife expects a real valentine and real chocolates. Enjoy the snow....


    a